And you are here why?

The American Family Association (of which the less said the better) has a new email out titled "What will religion look like in 2060 ". ThinkProgress has the details - go there and take a look at the original . The email deserves a thorough fisking, and thankfully Hunter is up to the task ( reproduced from the original below ) What will religion look like in the year 2060? Laser shows. Lots and lots of laser shows. Conservative Christians will be treated as second class citizens, much like African Americans were prior to civil rights legislation in the 1960s. There will be "conservative Christian" drinking fountains, and special "conservative Christians" entrances to buildings, and conservative Christians will be … oh, let's just move on. Family as we know it will be drastically changed with the state taking charge of the children beginning at birth. And doing what with them? Wildmon doesn't say, presumably because we would all find i...

Hoo boy - just when you thought you'd seen everything, along comes Daily Caller 's latest idiocy - Cigarette reviews . And not just any old review - reviews done with flair, style, and a remarkable degree of odiousness. So well done in fact that if it wasn't for the fact that this is almost Onion worthy.  Except that it is the Daily Caller - Tucker Carlson 's latest chumpy endeavor and is entirely serious. Patrick Howley's review of the Marlboro Red is truly the Mariah Carey of reviews - starting on a high note, and just going up from there. Before cigarettes were sold to men for the purpose of sexual solicitation, they were allowed to revel in their polarizing maleness, their seductiveness muted and irrelevant, their purpose utilitarian. Hoo boy.  Seriously? " sexual solicitation "? What on earth is Howley smoking? Apparently something a bit different from a Marlboro Red, I suspect.. Densely concentrated at its tip, the Marlboro requires a ...

They just had a fawning, fawning , article on The Brant Brothers, and I tell you what? You don't know who The Brant Brothers are? That, as it turns out, is the point! You don't, and, quite frankly, you don't want to! NOBODY should care who they are, except for the doofi at the NY Times Style Section who have decided that they are going to push them as the New Hilton Sisters! Anyhow, the NY Times Style Section had a fawning, fawning article on The Brant Brothers , which has such brilliant phrases in it as Harry, 15, and his 18-year-old brother are the well-spoken product of cross-pollination of the Übermenschen. “Everybody loves celebrity children,” said Stephanie Trong, the editorial director of The Cut. “But perhaps the biggest appeal is that these guys live in the lap of luxury and they’re extremely open about their exploits. How many teens go to couture shows or fashion parties, much less document them on their joint Twitter feed, in such a hilarious, unc...

Noah Smith brings the pain to the WSJ editorial page. Mind you, that is somewhat unto shooting fish in a barrel, but it is still fun to read a comprehensive and thorough Fisking He first calls attention to what appears to be a massive exodus from the Golden State: Nearly four million more people have left the Golden State in the last two decades than have come from other states. This is a sharp reversal from the 1980s... Wow, California must be well on its way to being a ghost town. Oh wait, no. Because during those past two decades, immigration more than made up the difference. California's population has risen from 29.8 million to 37.3 million. [...]Next up, we have some pure unadulterated old-fashioned bullshit: "[I]f you're a guy working for a Silicon Valley company and you're married and you're thinking about having your first kid, and your family makes 250-k a year, you can't buy a closet in the Bay Area," Mr. Kotkin says. The   median...

This showed up in the Google-Bag just now It is my pleasure to have this opportunity to offer you a business transaction, which will yield high dividends for both of us.. The following is a brief overview on what the offer entails.. This offer entails you to stand as a supplier of a certain product to my company. I will secure a supply contract deal for you as our supplier of the product. This product is currently being sold by the manufacturer at a very low price and can be sold to my company at a much higher price.(The margin is over 90%) , getting my company to purchase the product at your fixed price is not a problem, my company is in need of this product. Basically what you are doing is to purchase this product at a relatively low price and sell it to my company at a marked up price, it is a legal transaction and I need you to partner with me on this project.please indicate your phone number in your reply if its different from the number stated above.. So, why exactly am ...