U.S. anti-competitiveness
The NY Times has an article up about the iPhone jobs ending up in China. It (i think) is supposed to be about how they are more flexible, faster, etc. except that I read it as being behavior that we explicitly don't want. Choice quotes
Isn't this basically indentured servitude? Again, wasn't this exactly the kind of stuff that we fought against, and eventually got rid of? "A biscuit and a cup of tea" - great. And a pat on the back too when they're done, I bet.
Just saying...
When an Apple team visited, the Chinese plant’s owners were already constructing a new wing. “This is in case you give us the contract,” the manager said, according to a former Apple executive. The Chinese government had agreed to underwrite costs for numerous industries, and those subsidies had trickled down to the glass-cutting factory. It had a warehouse filled with glass samples available to Apple, free of charge. The owners made engineers available at almost no cost. They had built on-site dormitories so employees would be available 24 hours a day.To me, this sounds like exactly the kind of behavior that we rail against - we don't want our government subsidizing our industries, picking winners/losers, etc. do we?
A foreman immediately roused 8,000 workers inside the company’s dormitories, according to the executive. Each employee was given a biscuit and a cup of tea, guided to a workstation and within half an hour started a 12-hour shift fitting glass screens into beveled frames. Within 96 hours, the plant was producing over 10,000 iPhones a day.
Isn't this basically indentured servitude? Again, wasn't this exactly the kind of stuff that we fought against, and eventually got rid of? "A biscuit and a cup of tea" - great. And a pat on the back too when they're done, I bet.
Just saying...
Comments